Anthropic Anthropic 官方 Official 社区 showcase Community showcase + 精选 + Featured

Claude Opus 5.5(Anthropic) Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)

Anthropic 于 2026-09-22 发布的 Claude 5.5 家族第一款模型。官方页正文称:它在多数工作上达到 Claude Fable 5.1 的水平,按典型负载跑起来比 Opus 5 少 40% 花费;meta description 称它在 agentic coding 与知识工作上领先,且比 Opus 5 少 40% 运行成本。官方价目(每百万 token):输入 $4、输出 $20(称比 Opus 5 少 20%),cache reads $0.20(对照 Opus 5 的 $0.50,称少 60%),cache writes $5(对照 $6.25);fast mode 为输入 $8 / 输出 $40,称最高 2.5 倍速度。第三方榜:Artificial Analysis 页面(变体 “Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback”)列出 Intelligence Index 58(#1 / 211)、输入 $4.00 / 输出 $20.00、缓存折扣 95%、每任务 $5.98、1M 上下文;速度栏为 N/A。 Anthropic’s first model in the Claude 5.5 family, announced 2026-09-22. The page says it performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5 on typical workloads; the meta description says it leads in agentic coding and knowledge work and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5. Vendor price table (per 1M tokens): input $4, output $20 (claimed 20% less than Opus 5), cache reads $0.20 (vs Opus 5 at $0.50, claimed 60% less), cache writes $5 (vs $6.25); fast mode is $8 input / $40 output, claimed up to 2.5× speed. Third-party board: the Artificial Analysis page (variant “Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback”) lists Intelligence Index 58 (#1 / 211), $4.00 input / $20.00 output, a 95% cache discount, $5.98 per task, and a 1M context; the speed cell is N/A.

预览:Playwright 实拍 anthropic.com/claude-opus-5-5 首屏 Preview: Playwright capture of anthropic.com/claude-opus-5-5 above the fold

来源Sources

为什么推荐Why we recommend it 同板 step-5-preview 的官方对照表写的是 Claude Opus 5(不是 5.5),互链只表示同板相关,不表示阶跃评过 Opus 5.5。社区绘画演示只在 HTML 库。整理质量 4 星(来源齐、边界清),不代表基准分。 On the vendor table Astra is ahead of Opus 5.5 on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 and AutomationBench, so the meta “leads” line is not treated as first on every row. The step-5-preview card’s vendor table names Claude Opus 5 (not 5.5); the cross-link is same-board only and does not mean StepFun evaluated Opus 5.5. The community painting demo stays in the HTML library.

核验记录:来源、抓取与截图说明Verification log: sources, checks, and captures

收录理由:2026-09-22 发布的 Anthropic 前沿卡,官方页、AA 第三方榜与 HN item 49803892(Algolia 核对 1793pts)当晚均可核,适合 Models 看板头条。核实边界:定位、40% 成本、价目、$4/$20/$0.20、fast mode、基准表与「全平台可用」一律为官方页自述(anthropic.com/claude-opus-5-5,2026-09-25 HTTP 200),本库未复跑、未实测 API;官方表里 Astra 在 Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 与 AutomationBench 上高于 Opus 5.5,故不把 meta 里的 “leads” 当成全表第一。Intelligence Index 58、#1/211、$5.98/任务、95% 缓存折扣、速度 N/A、1M 上下文来自 Artificial Analysis 页面(2026-09-25 HTTP 200),非本库复跑。预览为 Playwright 实拍官方页首屏裁 3:2 WebP。 (官方页标题 “Introducing Claude Opus 5.5”,HTTP 200) (Algolia 核对 1793pts,2026-09-22 ~16:29Z) HN:item 49803892 。Why: an Anthropic frontier card announced 2026-09-22, with the official page, the AA third-party board, and HN item 49803892 (1793pts on Algolia at check time) all reachable tonight — a Models-board headline. Boundary: positioning, the 40% cost claim, the price table, $4/$20/$0.20, fast mode, the benchmark table, and “available on all platforms” are vendor claims from anthropic.com/claude-opus-5-5 (HTTP 200 on 2026-09-25); nothing re-run here, API untested. Intelligence Index 58, #1/211, $5.98/task, the 95% cache discount, speed N/A, and the 1M context come from the Artificial Analysis page (HTTP 200 on 2026-09-25), not re-run here. Preview is a Playwright capture of the official page above the fold, cropped to 3:2 WebP. 4 stars for curation quality (complete sources, clear boundaries) — not a benchmark rating. (official page title “Introducing Claude Opus 5.5”, HTTP 200) (1793pts on Algolia at check time, 2026-09-22 ~16:29Z) HN: item 49803892 .

要点(官方称 / 社区称)Highlights (vendor / community claims)

  • 官方称:Claude 5.5 家族第一款;正文写多数工作达到 Fable 5.1 水平,典型负载比 Opus 5 少 40% 花费,输出比 Opus 5 快 30% 以上。同页又称 Sonnet 5.5 与 Haiku 5.5 将在随后数周推出。平台模型 id 写作 claude-opus-5-5,并称已在全平台可用,包括 Amazon Web Services、Google Cloud 与 Microsoft Azure。 Vendor claim: first model in the Claude 5.5 family; the page says it matches Fable 5.1 on most work, costs 40% less than Opus 5 on typical workloads, and generates output more than 30% faster than Opus 5. The same page says Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 follow in the coming weeks. The platform model id is written claude-opus-5-5, and the page says it is available on all platforms, including Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
  • 官方称(价目表,每百万 token):cache reads $0.20(Opus 5 为 $0.50)、输入 $4(Opus 5 为 $5)、输出 $20(Opus 5 为 $25)、cache writes $5(Opus 5 为 $6.25)。页面另写输入/输出比 Opus 5 少 20%,cache reads 少 60%;fast mode(Claude Code 与 Claude Platform)最高 2.5 倍速度,输入 $8 / 输出 $40。本库未实测 API。 Vendor claim (price table, per 1M tokens): cache reads $0.20 (Opus 5 $0.50), input $4 (Opus 5 $5), output $20 (Opus 5 $25), cache writes $5 (Opus 5 $6.25). The page also says input/output are 20% less than Opus 5 and cache reads are 60% less; fast mode (Claude Code and the Claude Platform) is up to 2.5× speed at $8 input / $40 output. API not tested here.
  • 官方称(对照表,列序 Opus 5.5 / Fable 5.1 / Opus 5 / GPT-6 Astra / GPT-5.6 Sol;页注除另有说明外 Opus 5.5 为 adaptive thinking、max effort;Terminal-Bench 4.0 的 Opus 5.5 为 xhigh、GPT-6 Astra 为 high,且为 OpenAI 所报):Terminal-Bench 4.0 66.4% / 55.8% / 52.3% / 57.9% / 37.3%;FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) 54.4% / 50.3% / 48.0% / 53.3% / 47.5%。同表另有 Astra 更高的行:Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 为 64.6% 对 Opus 5.5 的 58.7%;AutomationBench(页注由 Zapier 跑)为 41.4% 对 40.0%。页面自己也写:与 Fable 5.1 的实际差距比这些分数看起来更窄。本库未复跑。 Vendor claim (comparison table, columns Opus 5.5 / Fable 5.1 / Opus 5 / GPT-6 Astra / GPT-5.6 Sol; the page says Opus 5.5 results use adaptive thinking at max effort unless noted; Terminal-Bench 4.0 is xhigh for Opus 5.5 and high for GPT-6 Astra, the latter as reported by OpenAI): Terminal-Bench 4.0 66.4% / 55.8% / 52.3% / 57.9% / 37.3%; FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) 54.4% / 50.3% / 48.0% / 53.3% / 47.5%. The same table has rows where Astra is ahead: Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 is 64.6% vs Opus 5.5 at 58.7%; AutomationBench (page note: run by Zapier) is 41.4% vs 40.0%. The page itself also says the real gap versus Fable 5.1 is narrower than these scores suggest. None re-run here.
  • 第三方榜(Artificial Analysis,非官方、非本库):页面标题为 “Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)”,变体 “Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback”;Intelligence Index 58(#1 / 211),速度 Output tokens per second 为 N/A,价格输入 $4.00 / 输出 $20.00、Cache Discount 95%、Cost per Intelligence Index task $5.98,Verbosity 260M output tokens(#96 / 211)。技术规格写推理版、输入 text and image、输出 text、上下文 1M。发布月记为 September 2026。不把 AA 的 95% 缓存折扣与官方 $0.20 cache reads 合成新指标。 Third-party board (Artificial Analysis — neither vendor nor this library): page title “Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)”, variant “Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback”; Intelligence Index 58 (#1 / 211); output tokens per second is N/A; pricing $4.00 input / $20.00 output, Cache Discount 95%, $5.98 cost per Intelligence Index task; verbosity 260M output tokens (#96 / 211). Specs list a reasoning version, text and image input, text output, and a 1M context. Release month is written September 2026. The AA 95% cache discount is not merged here with the vendor’s $0.20 cache-read price into a new figure.
  • 社区演示(echohive 页面自述,非本库复跑,也不另开 Models demo 卡):https://www.echohive.ai/experiments/dinosaurs 《The Last Day》自称 “A 2.5D PAINTING · MADE BY OPUS 5.5”。条目在 HTML 库 last-day-dinosaurs,不进本板。 Community demo (echohive page self-description, not re-run here, and not a separate Models demo card): https://www.echohive.ai/experiments/dinosaurs “The Last Day” calls itself “A 2.5D PAINTING · MADE BY OPUS 5.5”. The entry lives in the HTML library as last-day-dinosaurs, not on this board.

同板相关Related on this board

同一看板上互相关联的卡:社区 demo 指回它跑的模型,模型指向值得看的 demo。Cards linked on this board: a community demo points back to the model it ran on; the model points to demos worth a look.